Judgment Sample

Judgment Sample Audit Sampling Methods Professional Judgment Auditing Practice Accounting Financial Audits
A judgment sample is a determination by an auditor, based on personal experience and familiarity with the client, of the number of items, as well as the particular items, to be examined in a population. This function allows the accountant to maintain objectivity and thoroughness in testing the sampled items for accuracy.
On this page

Definition

A judgment sample in the context of auditing and accounting refers to a method where the auditor uses professional experience and understanding of the client’s business to select a non-random sample from a larger population of items or transactions for examination. The objective is to scrutinize specific items that may have a higher risk of error or misstatement. This approach contrasts with statistical sampling methods that rely on random selection and probability theory.

Examples

  1. Inventory Testing: An auditor familiar with a client’s inventory practices may choose to sample items that have high value or are frequently subject to obsolescence rather than selecting items randomly.

  2. Accounts Receivable Review: For a company with numerous small receivables and a few large receivables, an auditor might specifically choose to test the large receivables due to their potential material impact on the financial statements.

  3. Expense Verification: If an auditor knows that certain expense categories have historically been prone to misstatement or management override, they may selectively sample these categories for detailed testing.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is the main advantage of using a judgment sample?

The primary advantage is the auditor’s ability to use their expertise and knowledge of the client to identify and focus on areas with a higher risk of misstatement, potentially increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of the audit.

How does judgment sampling maintain objectivity?

Despite the subjective nature of choosing samples, auditors maintain objectivity through adherence to professional auditing standards, consistent application of criteria for sample selection, and thorough documentation of their rationale and procedures.

Can judgment sampling be used in conjunction with statistical sampling?

Yes, auditors often use a combination of judgmental and statistical sampling in practice to balance the thoroughness of testing with the practical constraints of time and resources.

Is judgment sampling applicable only in financial audits?

No, judgment sampling can be utilized in various types of audits, including compliance, operational, and internal audits, where the auditor’s professional judgment is relied upon to assess risks and determine sample items.

What are the potential drawbacks of judgment sample?

One potential drawback is the inherent subjectivity, which may introduce bias if not properly managed. Additionally, judgment sampling may not provide as strong a basis for generalizing results to the entire population compared to statistical methods.

  • Statistical Sampling: A methodology that uses probability theory to select random samples from a population, providing a measurable assurance that the sample accurately represents the population.
  • Audit Risk: The risk that an auditor may issue an inappropriate opinion on financial statements that are materially misstated.
  • Materiality: The threshold or magnitude of an omission or misstatement that, individually or aggregated, could influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of financial statements.
  • Internal Control: Processes put in place by an organization to ensure the integrity of financial and accounting information, promote accountability, and prevent fraud.

Online References

  1. American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) - Auditing Standards
  2. Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - Standard on Sampling
  3. AccountingTools - Judgment Sampling

Suggested Books for Further Studies

  1. “Auditing and Assurance Services” by Alvin A. Arens, Randal J. Elder, and Mark S. Beasley
  2. “Audit Sampling: An Introduction to Statistical Sampling in Auditing” by Dan M. Guy, Douglas A. Carmichael, and O. Ray Whittington
  3. “Principles of Auditing & Other Assurance Services” by Ray Whittington and Kurt Pany

Fundamentals of Judgment Sample: Accounting Basics Quiz

### What is a primary reason for choosing a judgment sample over a statistical sample? - [ ] To reduce audit fees significantly - [x] To allow the auditor to use their professional judgment and experience - [ ] To ensure each item in the population has an equal chance of selection - [ ] To automate the sampling process > **Explanation:** The primary reason for choosing a judgment sample is to leverage the auditor's professional judgment and experience to focus on areas with a higher risk of misstatement. ### How does judgment sampling differ from statistical sampling? - [ ] Judgment sampling uses random selection. - [ ] Statistical sampling relies on the auditor's intuition. - [ ] Judgment sampling is only used for qualitative data. - [x] Statistical sampling uses probability theory, while judgment sampling relies on the auditor's judgment. > **Explanation:** Statistical sampling uses probability theory to randomly select items, while judgment sampling relies on the auditor's professional judgment to determine sample items. ### In what type of audits is judgment sampling applicable? - [x] Financial, compliance, operational, and internal audits - [ ] Only financial audits - [ ] Only compliance audits - [ ] Only operational audits > **Explanation:** Judgment sampling can be used in various types of audits, including financial, compliance, operational, and internal audits. ### What is a drawback of judgment sampling? - [ ] It requires extensive statistical knowledge. - [x] It may introduce auditor bias if not properly managed. - [ ] It is time-consuming and costly. - [ ] It does not require any professional judgment. > **Explanation:** A potential drawback of judgment sampling is the possibility of introducing bias if the auditor's judgment is not adequately checked and managed. ### What is audit risk? - [ ] The risk of a client going bankrupt - [ ] The risk of auditors being sued - [x] The risk that an auditor may issue an inappropriate opinion on materially misstated financial statements - [ ] The risk of selecting an incorrect sample size > **Explanation:** Audit risk is the risk that an auditor may issue an inappropriate opinion on financial statements that are materially misstated. ### Why might an auditor choose to use both judgment and statistical sampling methods? - [ ] To simplify the audit process - [ ] To increase the randomness of sample selection - [x] To balance thoroughness and efficiency - [ ] To reduce the need for professional judgment > **Explanation:** Auditors might use both judgment and statistical sampling to balance thoroughness with efficiency, leveraging the strengths of both methods. ### What is the role of materiality in auditing? - [x] To determine the significance of omissions or misstatements that could influence financial statement users' decisions - [ ] To check the completeness of inventory records - [ ] To identify all small discrepancies in financial statements - [ ] To measure the accuracy of accounting software > **Explanation:** Materiality determines the significance of omissions or misstatements that could influence the decisions of users relying on financial statements. ### What is internal control? - [ ] The process of managing human resources - [ ] The method by which financial data is generated - [x] Processes put in place by an organization to ensure financial integrity and accountability - [ ] The system of selecting audit clients > **Explanation:** Internal control comprises processes established by an organization to ensure the integrity of financial and accounting information, promote accountability, and prevent fraud. ### How does an auditor maintain objectivity when using judgment in sampling? - [ ] By relying solely on client-provided data - [ ] By avoiding professional standards - [x] By adhering to professional standards and documenting their rationale - [ ] By using random selection only > **Explanation:** Auditors maintain objectivity by adhering to professional auditing standards and thoroughly documenting the rationale behind their sample selection decisions. ### What is a key advantage of judgment sampling? - [ ] It eliminates the need for experience. - [x] It allows auditors to focus on items with higher risk of misstatement. - [ ] It is the cheapest method of sampling. - [ ] It requires no knowledge of the client's business. > **Explanation:** A key advantage of judgment sampling is that it enables auditors to focus their efforts on items that present a higher risk of misstatement based on their experience and knowledge of the client's business.

Thank you for exploring the concept of judgment sampling with us and attempting the quiz questions. Keep advancing your knowledge in accounting and auditing!

Wednesday, August 7, 2024
Judgment Sampling (Non-Statistical Sampling)
Judgment Proof
Attributes Sampling January 1, 1
Auditor's Certificate, Opinion, or Report January 1, 1
Government Accountability Office (GAO) January 1, 1
Public Accounting January 1, 1
Unqualified Opinion January 1, 1

Accounting Terms Lexicon

Discover comprehensive accounting definitions and practical insights. Empowering students and professionals with clear and concise explanations for a better understanding of financial terms.