Definition of Accord and Satisfaction
Accord and satisfaction is a legal method for resolving a contractual dispute by which one party performs different duties from those originally articulated in the contract, with the approval of the other party. This involves two components:
- Accord: The new agreement made between the parties to discharge an obligation.
- Satisfaction: The execution or consideration that makes the accord legally binding.
The process is crucial in contract law and debt settlement, where it allows the parties involved to avoid litigation by amicably resolving their disputes.
Examples of Accord and Satisfaction
-
Example 1: A furniture company has a contract to deliver a certain quality of chairs to a retailer. Due to production issues, the company offers chairs of slightly lesser quality but at a discounted price. The retailer agrees, effectively creating an accord. The discounted price serves as the satisfaction.
-
Example 2: A debtor owes $5,000 to a creditor but is unable to pay the full amount. They suggest paying $3,500 immediately as a full settlement. If the creditor agrees, this agreement discharges the original debt — the $3,500 is the satisfaction.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the difference between accord and satisfaction and a substitute agreement?
In an accord and satisfaction, the original contract is modified by a new agreement and followed by the performance which discharges the original obligation. In contrast, a substitute agreement fully replaces the original contract with a new one, involving no performance of the original obligation.
Does accord and satisfaction need to be in writing?
While it is often advisable to put an accord and satisfaction in writing to provide clear evidence of the new agreement and its terms, certain oral agreements may also be enforceable depending on the jurisdiction and specific circumstances.
Can accord and satisfaction be used to settle any contractual obligation?
Accord and happiness can generally be applied to most types of contractual obligations, but not necessarily all. Courts often require that the subject matter of the dispute be unliquidated (not precisely quantified) or subject to bona fide disagreement concerning the owed sum.
What happens if one party does not fulfill the satisfaction?
If the party responsible for fulfilling the satisfaction fails to do so, the obligee may claim breach of the new agreement (accord). The original contractual obligation might also be reinstated, allowing for a claim based on the original agreement.
Can accord and satisfaction discharge an obligation arising under tort law?
Yes, accord and satisfaction can be used to resolve obligations arising under tort law, provided that the involved parties agree to the terms and conditions of the agreement.
Related Terms with Definitions
- Consideration: Anything of value promised to another party in exchange for something else of value. Consideration is essential to make the accord legally binding.
- Breach of Contract: A legal cause of action where a binding agreement is not honored by one or more parties.
- Settlement Agreement: A legally-binding contract that resolves a dispute between parties without litigation.
- Discharge of Contract: The cancellation or termination of a contractual obligation.
Online Resources
- Investopedia: Basics of Accord and Satisfaction
- Legal Information Institute: Accord and Satisfaction
- NOLO: Accord and Satisfaction
Suggested Books for Further Studies
- “Contract Law: Text, Cases, & Materials” by Ewan McKendrick
- “Understanding Contract Law” by Richard Austen-Baker, Q.C.
- “Principles of Contract Law” by Robert Duxbury
Accounting Basics: “Accord and Satisfaction” Fundamentals Quiz
Thank you for embarking on this journey through our comprehensive accounting lexicon and tackling our challenging sample exam quiz questions. Keep striving for excellence in your financial knowledge!